David Oliver: Admission should allow for patient aids.

I’ve never believed that all hospital admissions are undesirable or avoidable. Sometimes admission is the best, only, or safest option. But it shouldn’t avoidably make patients worse for reasons unconnected to the illness causing admission. It’s a bewildering enough start, to be whisked out of your home at short notice into an ambulance, through a busy emergency floor and into the alien environment of a hospital ward. So why compound it? Patients often have walking aids and familiar chairs, as well as moving and handling devices they are practised with. Granted, some are unsafe. But rigid policies that prevent them being brought in with the patient or prevent hospitals from stocking or borrowing similar furniture don’t aid recovery; nor does our tendency to lose the mobility aids that patients do bring. It’s the antithesis of patient centred care. Talking of losing things, it’s still too common for patients to be admitted without their spectacles or to lose them when on the ward. And we sometimes fail to make appropriate adjustments for patients with known visual impairment or to pick up previously undetected visual problems—despite their high prevalence, especially in patients with presentations such as falls. Hospital staff’s training in basic oral care is patchy and easily neglected. Yet, as inpatients have a high risk of malnutrition and dental and oral hygiene are key factors in hospital acquired infections, it’s essential. 5 We compound this problem far too often by losing patients’ dentures during admission. The NHS often pays for replacements, but these can take days or weeks to arrive—while risks to nutrition mount.